Nebosh model question 1 and 2
Task 1: Justifying health and safety improvements
What financial arguments could you use to
justify your proposed recommendations to segregate FLTs and the workers? (10)
Note: You should support your answer, where applicable, using relevant information from the scenario.
This
question assessed learners’ knowledge and understanding
of assessment criteria 1.1: Discuss the moral, financial, and legal reasons
for managing health
and safety in the workplace; and 1.2: Explain
how the law works and the consequences of non-compliance.
For this question, answers must reflect sound financial arguments to justify proposed recommendations. Good responses would include:
‘There could be an impact on the reputation of the
organization, leading to breakdowns in business relationships. As a result,
the DIY store
may have to tender for new business, which costs money and time.’
This answer
states the negative financial argument for
not acting.
A positive argument would be:
‘A safer workplace is good for the worker
retention.’
Information
to help learners formulate appropriate responses to this question can be found
in the scenario, as signposted in
the instruction (Note).
Limited
responses would be general, vague answers regarding costs to the organization, rather
than specific costs, or not giving
all three types
of arguments, ie moral,
legal, and financial.
Ten marks were available for this question
and fewer answers given would
automatically mean less
marks could be awarded.
A positive argument would be:
‘A safer workplace is good for the worker
retention.’
Information
to help learners formulate appropriate responses to this question can be found
in the scenario, as signposted in
the instruction (Note).
Limited
responses would be general, vague answers regarding costs to the organization, rather
than specific costs, or not giving
all three types
of arguments, ie moral,
legal, and financial.
Ten marks were available for this question
and fewer answers given would
automatically mean less
marks could be awarded.
You email a report to the overall Store and Warehouse Manager, in a further attempt to convince them that safety needs improving. The report contains unsafe behavior that you have observed, unsafe behavior associated with historic incidents, and unsafe behavior relayed to you from other workers. Also, the report contains voluntary feedback on safety given to you by workers and managers.
Based on the scenario only:
(a)
what
unsafe behavior would be included in the report? (6)
This
question assessed learners’ knowledge and understanding of assessment criterion 4.1: Discuss common methods and indicators used
to monitor the effectiveness of management systems.
This question has been divided
into two separate parts, (a) and (b),
to help the learner to approach the task in smaller
sections rather than one large one.
The stem of the task gives the learner an idea of the structure the answer(s) can take (i.e.
the learner is emailing
a report).
The instruction given after the stem states the answers should be based on the scenario only, so information within the scenario
should trigger the answers required.
The two parts
of the question signpost what
the learner is looking
for in the scenario.
A
good response for part (a) would be:
‘Unsafe behavior observed:
-
stacking goods in aisles, thereby blocking designated walkways;
-
workers stepping
into vehicle routes.’
Although bullet points
are given, the answers are clear, concise and to the point, and within the context of the
scenario.
Inadequate responses would
be to state that there
were ‘high risks
in the factory’
and ‘lack of documentation in respect of accident reports’
as these are not behaviors.
There are
six marks available for this part
and therefore it is expected that a minimum
of six answers should be given.
(b)
what
voluntary feedback would be included in the
report? (4)
For part (b), ‘voluntary feedback’ could be extra
information that is not immediately obvious, ie more
cultural or managerial issues such as:
-
‘The warehouse workers rarely see management in the warehouse;
-
the
Store and Warehouse Manager does not offer support to prioritize health and
safety. They are concerned that implementing
measures would cause too much
disruption to the business and there is no
allocated budget;
-
risk assessments are too general
and do not reflect the actual risks in the warehouse.’
Again, the number of marks available equates to the number of answers expected
as a minimum.
0 Comments